Basis of supply
Identify whether the car is a policy courtesy benefit, direct third-party provision or a separate hire contract.
If anyone is injured, the road is obstructed or there is immediate danger, call 999 first.
Home Replacement Vehicle After A Non Fault Accident
Replacement car options after a non-fault accidentReplacement car options after a non-fault accident. The guidance keeps a clear boundary between coordination and external decisions.
Identify whether the car is a policy courtesy benefit, direct third-party provision or a separate hire contract.
Ask how the arrangement changes if responsibility is disputed, shared or accepted later than expected.
Insurance, excess, authorised drivers, mileage, fuel, damage reporting and return terms remain important.
A courtesy car and a credit-hire or direct-replacement vehicle may have materially different terms.
Calling the accident non-fault does not remove the need to read the agreement.
Keeping a car after the agreed need ends can create avoidable charges.
Responsibility boundary: Sterling can coordinate the available non-fault mobility route but cannot promise acceptance of liability, a particular car or recovery of supplier charges.
Replacement Car After a Non-Fault Accident can come through different arrangements. This page focuses on the decision route: current liability evidence, reasonable mobility need, available supply, contractual obligations and the response if the other side does not accept charges as expected.
It is for a driver comparing replacement arrangements after an accident believed to be another road user’s responsibility, rather than looking only for a vehicle specification.
Need, eligibility, availability and supplier terms are checked before a replacement vehicle is accepted.
Provide the third-party, insurer and evidence position supporting the non-fault proposal.
Record essential journeys, passengers and any necessary accessibility features.
Understand cost recovery, protection, restrictions and cancellation before choosing.
Use reasonable need and stock availability rather than assuming exact equivalence.
Coordinate return with repair completion, settlement or the contractual trigger.
It is for a driver comparing replacement arrangements after an accident believed to be another road user’s responsibility, rather than looking only for a vehicle specification.
The important areas are basis of supply, liability resilience, customer obligations. Each should be recorded accurately for the individual vehicle.
A courtesy car and a credit-hire or direct-replacement vehicle may have materially different terms. Calling the accident non-fault does not remove the need to read the agreement. Keeping a car after the agreed need ends can create avoidable charges.
No. Sterling can coordinate the available non-fault mobility route but cannot promise acceptance of liability, a particular car or recovery of supplier charges.
Review eligibility, availability, costs and terms before accepting a vehicle.
View mobility guidanceSee what evidence helps the liability review and what still depends on another party.
View non-fault guidanceSee how assessment, authorisation and the repair hand-off work.
View repair guidanceSterling will review the vehicle position, explain the available coordination route and identify which organisation must make the next decision.